The real process of science

I was perhaps too glib in my previous post, summing up science as “observe, hypothesize, test, conclude, rehypothesize, ad infinitum”. As others have pointed out, this is way too simplistic, and the actual process of science involves much more at each of those steps, and does not necessarily proceed in that order. There is a lot of background reading, a lot of exploratory research, a lot of collaboration and discussion with other scientists, and a fair amount of serendipity. All of this forms a convoluted path with many false starts, loop backs, and open-ended branches.

From Understanding Science website (http://undsci.berkeley.edu/)

From Understanding Science website (http://undsci.berkeley.edu/)

A very excellent resource called “Understanding Science” describes the process of science clearly and in great detail, and includes some great sections on scientific publications, the social side of science, the benefits of science, and science and media/policy. Now that is a great example of science communication!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s